Walton: Symphony No.1; Cello Concerto

Continuing its ‘British Composers’ series, EMI has here ingeniously coupled two contrasting masterpieces by Walton. The Symphony is the more familiar: its first three movements (premiered in 1934, before he composed the finale) still sound astonishingly violent and disturbing. Rattle’s conducting is well-paced and energetic, and the CBSO’s playing quite outstanding. The strings, in particular, give tremendous vitality to Walton’s jagged rhythms. I like Rattle’s cool approach to the slow movement: it is marked ‘con malinconia’ but can too often sound self-pitying.

Our rating

4

Published: January 20, 2012 at 2:36 pm

COMPOSERS: Walton
LABELS: EMI
WORKS: Symphony No.1; Cello Concerto
PERFORMER: Lynn Harrell (cello); CBSO/Simon Rattle
CATALOGUE NO: CDC 7 5457 2 DDD

Continuing its ‘British Composers’ series, EMI has here ingeniously coupled two contrasting masterpieces by Walton. The Symphony is the more familiar: its first three movements (premiered in 1934, before he composed the finale) still sound astonishingly violent and disturbing. Rattle’s conducting is well-paced and energetic, and the CBSO’s playing quite outstanding. The strings, in particular, give tremendous vitality to Walton’s jagged rhythms. I like Rattle’s cool approach to the slow movement: it is marked ‘con malinconia’ but can too often sound self-pitying. What I do miss, however, is the sheer fury of Previn’s famous 1966 LSO performance: Rattle is sometimes a bit polite. But he does produce a glorious account of the angst-free finale. It still doesn’t sound totally convincing, but as one of Walton’s friends said: ‘the trouble was that Willie changed girlfriends between movements’. By the time he came to write a concerto for Piatigorsky (completed in 1956), Walton’s temperament had been mellowed by the Mediterranean sun of his Ischia home. This is a lyrical work with roots in the English pastoral tradition (albeit via Prokofiev). Harrell is not quite so warm an advocate as Yo-Yo Ma or Raphael Wallfisch (nor so favoured by microphone placing), but again the orchestra plays superbly. Both recordings are good, though one might have wished for greater instrumental detail. Stephen Maddock

This website is owned and published by Our Media Ltd. www.ourmedia.co.uk
© Our Media 2024